Technology & Changing Values

My Master’s course (ETEC511) is currently focusing on Politics & Technology.  One of the questions to consider is, “Illustrate with an example how a value that was inherent in a particular technology changed your values.”  This is my response:

Napster(and other methods of downloading sites, software and methods) is an example of technology changing how I looked at what I considered entertainment and the value I placed on it. It also changed my values toward what is considered theft. I am a huge fan of all kinds of music and I have about 400 legally purchased CDs. Before that I bought records and cassettes. To be sure the music industry has received a lot of my discretionary spending money. I remember reading an article when I was in high school in the 80’s that talked about Bon Jovi  (sorry, never been a big fan) receiving about 25 cents for every $10.00 casette they sold and a sick amount of the revenue went to the record labels. At the time they had one of the biggest selling albums and when I did the math I was really struck by how little rock stars receive off it. In the article it said that most of a rock star’s money at the time was made mainly off of concert shirts and touring for a good part of the year.  It made me feel it was harder for them than I thought and they had to work (sex, booze & drugs aside) in a pretty grueling lifestyle.

Fast forward to the late 90’s and the debate over Napster, one of the first illegal download sites for music lovers, and this debate changed my values toward entertainment in general and what is “theft”. At the time arguably the world’s biggest band, Metallica (again, never a big fan), was against Napster and testified in congress against them. I lost a lot of respect for mainstream, superstar musicians like that because I realized that what they were fighting for wasn’t their own and their fellow less well known musicians’ well being, but really the well being of the record company and corporations. These musicians who marketed themselves as rebels were exposing themselves as corporate phonies who were interested in keeping the system exactly the way it was. The amount of money the band was making off of each CD was still miniscule and the distribution of it through the Internet could arguably be seen as PR for their real money making, the concerts, merchandise, etc. Instead they chose to sue their fans for illegally downloading their music, the very same people who put them where they were in the first place.

Worse yet, when you really think about how much it costs to make a CD it is not worth near its retail value (we are talking about big name artists here, not smaller artists that need to sell as many CDs as possible to break even). Why so much? For company profit and unecessary marketing. The Internet and music downloading made me question whom was really stealing from whom? What do I as a consumer need with endless marketing blitzes polluting my eyes and ears? Have you ever been to Tokyo’s Shibuya area?  If not check this out.   Most of the noise you hear and the electronic billboards you see are music industry advertising.  Wow factor aside, do we really need this?  Can I still buy music online and eliminate the money that goes to these marketing eyesores?  The music industry is overcharging for a product that they used to have a near monopoly on.  Why isn’t that theft?  Isn’t it “theft” by robbing our public places of (relative) peace and quiet to blare unnecessary advertising, forcing us to consume it even if all we want to do is walk down a street?

Metallica later changed their view about the Internet and downloading once they saw that it was still possible to make money off of it, but it was too late. While I would never begrudge an artist for making money, the question of how took on greater importance for me. I began to question many things around me that I took for granted as pure entertainment and realized that most, if not all, had a political and economic slant to them.

** Update:  Craig Newark, founder of Craigslist, has a something to say about the subject.

The End Of Email?

The Wall Street Journal has a recent article on the end of email, which basically states that social networking sites and soon to be released technology such as Google Wave are making email obsolete.  While I am not saying the author is right I do find the argument interesting.  As usual I find the comments attached to the article very interesting because  they almost overwhelmingly speak out against the article’s thesis.  Many of the reasons why people think this is untrue make a lot of sense to me but if you look back in history there are many, many instances where people scoffed at new technology and inventions only to have that same thing grow in poplularity until they became essential items in society.  I also think that the people making the arguments against the article’s thesis are older business types so I wonder if they represent all users of email or only a certain demographic.  Here are some comments from possibly a different type of readers so you can see what they say.

What do you think?  Is email here to stay or is it going to go the way of the Colecovision?  Is the person writing this article going Back to the Future and the others are just standing around in disbelief?:

Internet Addicting? Can’t Be…

internetaddiction2There is no question that the Internet has radically transformed how we work and play, but is the Internet addicting?  It is important for heavy computer users to have other interests when they go “off the grid.”  What do you do when you are not on the computer?  Are you spending too much time on the computer, especially the Internet?  What is the Internet doing to your brain?

Viral Video

The earlier post on the Facebook poll on President Obama’s assisination was not what I was planning on posting about this morning.  Because it is such a sober topic I think I also need to post about Viral Video.  Wikipedia define’s viral video as, “a video clip that gains widespread popularity through the process of Internet sharing, typically through email or Instant messaging, blogs and other media sharing websites.”

I find many of these videos to be extensions of what you used to see on America’s Funniest Home Videos in its heyday, but now you have control of what videos you will see.  It is also easier to get any video you want to be seen into the public sphere.

Anything could go viral and it often makes me wonder why people are so drawn to certain videos.  Personally, I like the videos that are uplifting and joyous.  My two recent favourites that meet this criteria are the ones by the University of Quebec students who filmed an amazing one take video to a Black Eyed Peas’ song and the wedding intro. dance by JK.  The wedding dance video is now over 25 million hits and counting!  Can the University of Quebec students’ video (at over 200, 000 and counting) beat it?  Here they are:


 
They are just so fun to watch. Here is Countdown’s list of the most popular viral videos. Which viral video do you like? Is it on this list?

The Influence of Social Networking, Part Deux…

Yesterday I posted about Social Networking sites and the influence they are having on society. Today in the news we find out that a Facebook poll asked the question “Shoud Obama be killed?” and over 700 people had answered it.

This post is not about politics.  According to Jose Antonio Vargas if you search the site for Sarah Palin you will find disagreeable pages as well.  According to him it is not Facebook itself that is the problem.  Rather it is the people who use Facebook that are the problem.  While I don’t disagree with him it does concern me what this means for our society when false and/or hurtful information can spread so virally.  If Facebook were around on November 22, 1963 perhaps there would have been an organized mob of people pointing guns at President Kennedy rather than just Lee Harvey Oswald’s (he was the lone shooter, right?)?

I agree with what Kathleen Hall Jamieson says about society when she says in Vargas’ article that, “Society has always had extremists.  They just haven’t had a public venue we could all see before…”.  Sites such as Facebook do allow for unsavory views to be shared but ultimately it is the user’s belief and values that must resist against participating in hurtful things like this online poll.  It is for this reason that I think Facebook should not be the target of our scorn. 

So, what is the best way to fight extremist views while still maintaining freedom of communication?  Vargas talks about how social networking is relatively new and as a resulthere is no agreement on an acceptable code of conduct.  Ultimately the answer will lie in education.  All users, especially young people will need to be educated on how to identify extremist, hurtful views and what steps they should take to reject them.

This situation raises many questions.  Should social networking sites be shut down to protect the public?  Would this action be a limit on free speech and run counter to our society’s values of freedom and democracty?  Shoud there be stricter moderation of social networking sites?  Should there be an online code of conduct?  If so, how would it be enforced?  Who would be in charge?  How do we stop dangerous extremism from spreading while still protecting freedom of speech?  Can the Internet be controlled?  Should it be?

These are all interesting questions that deserve our contemplation.  What do you think?

The Influence of Social Networking…

I find Social Networking sites, especially ones like Facebook, to be fascinating from a sociological perspective. Admittedly I spend/waste? time on them so I am not an impartial observer, but I often think about how these things are changing our societal values, interactions etc. A 16 year old relative of mine doesn`t even think twice when he posts about illegal activities he does with his friends, nor does he worry about posting pictures that show them in incriminating situations. He does this despite being “friends” with about 15 of our relatives, including his uncle aunt and his great uncles and aunts. If it was only him I would say he is not the smartest guy in the world, but I see a lot of my younger “friends” on Facebook, and by extension their “friends”, do the same thing. I contend what is happening is a shift in social values in regards to privacy and information not simply a bunch of stupid teenagers being ignorant of their online profiles.

More and more articles are coming out about Social Networking and how it is affecting culture. Reading them tends to reinforce my opinion that changes are afoot. But, if you really stop and think about them you must question this logic. Are real changes in culture happening, or are people doing what they have always done but in different mediums?

What are your thoughts about these articles:

Social Networking has tripled
What is privacy today?
Social Networking and the effect on television
Facebook bullies sued by mother

Net Neutrality

There is an important development going on in the United States (and perhaps other countries) where the outcome would severly impact users of the Internet. It is called Net Neutrality, where some telecommunication companies who offer Internet access as a service are proposing to create a two tiered (or perhaps more?) level of access to information. Basically, some services and information on the web could potential be accessed faster and more easily, but for a cost, while some services and information would be accessed much more slowly and with more difficulty. This would be done to increase their profits and increase control of the information found on the web. This is important for all users because it would be just a matter of time before a model like this would spread throughout the world and would fundamentally change the concept of the Internet and the role it plays in our lives.

Democracy Now! had Timothy Karr, campaign director of Free Press, on to discuss the issue. Here is the conversation:

What do you think? Is it important to ensure all access to the Internet is equal or do telecom companies have a right to create access systems as they see fit?

Worried About Your Friendships?

Do you use Facebook?  If you do you know that it opens up a whole new set of doors when it comes to relationships.  What does “friendship” mean?  Can you be “friends” with ex girlfriends or boyfriends?  How do your “friendships” affect your working life?  What is and is not appropriate to post on the Internet?

These are just some of the questions that have arisen due to social networking sites such as Facebook.  I personally find the whole thing fascinating from a sociological point of view.  One thing is for sure, you must be careful with your friendships when it comes to social networking sites.