3 Little Pigs Use the Net

Wee

It has been awhile since I have used this blog because I have been so busy with my Master’s Course. But, it will become more active soon, especially in the new year when I take my final course in the program. At that time I will have to sharpen this up and finish turning it into my e-portfolio.

In the meantime, I am posting the latest task I have completed for my ETEC565 course. I had to choose a Web 2.0 application and use it to create a digital story. I chose Prezi and used it to create 3 Little Pigs Use the Net. This will be used in my grade 6 class as an introduction to their Presentation authoring unit, where they will have to make a similar story on Internet safety, but also add a bit more content than what I did (this was done deliberately to help students recognize the need to ensure their are appropriate facts contained in their own stories).

Without further ado, enjoy the story: http://prezi.com/bcarmj72_vpy/3-little-pigs-use-the-net/

Web 2.0

web20peopleFor my ETEC511 course I was asked to define Web 2.0:

Web 2.0 describes the second layer of Internet computing where users collaborate online to add and share content. Now the web is a much more social area where users are creators and publishers of content, resulting in a “collective intelligence”.

Websites are no longer static places of information that readers consume. Now sites are dynamic and interactive, incorporating web applications to engage users. Main features of Web 2.0 are:

1.Using online technology to make connections between users, business teams and software applications.
2.Users easily add or access digital media.
3.Component services can be put together to create integrated online content.

As a result:

1.Information is being produced at massive rates.
2.Communication has become open.
3.Webmasters now share responsibility with users to ensure quality and relevancy of information.
4.Economic models of the web have changed.

The first phase of the Internet is considered Web 1.0. This was an electronic version of traditional publishing, where one entity published material and one entity consumed it. The electronic format made it easier to self publish so not only large companies were producing material. In this model the site moderator was responsible for ensuring the site was updated and contained quality information. Also, the business strategy adopted during this phase of the Internet was to build an attractive website and hope people would view it. This phase of the Internet reached its peak with the dot com bubble of the 90`s, after which people were searching for new ideas for using the web, hence the formation of ideas that eventually led to what we now know as Web 2.0.

The term was first popularized around October 2004. At this time O`Reily Media and Media Live International held a series web development conferences called Web 2.0. The name stuck and transformed to become a catch all phrase for what some saw as a web renaissance of creative uses for the Internet.  Web 2.0 changes how companies approach business on the web and this impacts users. Most users tend to inhabit certain sites such as Facebook, You Tube, etc. As a result businesses must attach their name to sites like these to promote their brand. Also, the purchase of standalone software should decrease as free online software increases in popularity. Web 2.0 has resulted in a business model where 99% of users are offered free access to basic Internet based software and 1% of specialized users are charged to use advanced features.

Three basic innovations in computing facilitated the shift to a Web 2.0 model:

1.Rich Internet Applications – browsing experience now similar to a desktop.
2.Service Oriented Applications – other applications integrate these into their functionality.
3.Increased Social Applications – allows users give feedback, content, etc.

Examples of Web 2.0 include Facebook, Delicious, Podcasts, RSS feeds, Flickr, Blogs, You Tube, Wikis, Google Maps, Digg and Technolchrati.

Further Reading:

http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
http://www.explainingcomputers.com/web2.html

The End Of Email?

The Wall Street Journal has a recent article on the end of email, which basically states that social networking sites and soon to be released technology such as Google Wave are making email obsolete.  While I am not saying the author is right I do find the argument interesting.  As usual I find the comments attached to the article very interesting because  they almost overwhelmingly speak out against the article’s thesis.  Many of the reasons why people think this is untrue make a lot of sense to me but if you look back in history there are many, many instances where people scoffed at new technology and inventions only to have that same thing grow in poplularity until they became essential items in society.  I also think that the people making the arguments against the article’s thesis are older business types so I wonder if they represent all users of email or only a certain demographic.  Here are some comments from possibly a different type of readers so you can see what they say.

What do you think?  Is email here to stay or is it going to go the way of the Colecovision?  Is the person writing this article going Back to the Future and the others are just standing around in disbelief?:

Internet Addicting? Can’t Be…

internetaddiction2There is no question that the Internet has radically transformed how we work and play, but is the Internet addicting?  It is important for heavy computer users to have other interests when they go “off the grid.”  What do you do when you are not on the computer?  Are you spending too much time on the computer, especially the Internet?  What is the Internet doing to your brain?

Wikipedia Controversy

My grade 6 classes are currently conducting Internet searches.  The goal is to learn how to identify legitimate academic sites and eliminate sites that don’t provide proper information.  Part of this unit is to discuss the value of Wikipedia as an academic tool.  The site has its fair share of detractors and supporters and there are some surprisingly controversial entries.  You would think these may be about divisive issues such as capital punishment, politicians like Sarah Palin or Barack Obama, but those are not the only controversial topics on Wikipedia.

Viral Video

The earlier post on the Facebook poll on President Obama’s assisination was not what I was planning on posting about this morning.  Because it is such a sober topic I think I also need to post about Viral Video.  Wikipedia define’s viral video as, “a video clip that gains widespread popularity through the process of Internet sharing, typically through email or Instant messaging, blogs and other media sharing websites.”

I find many of these videos to be extensions of what you used to see on America’s Funniest Home Videos in its heyday, but now you have control of what videos you will see.  It is also easier to get any video you want to be seen into the public sphere.

Anything could go viral and it often makes me wonder why people are so drawn to certain videos.  Personally, I like the videos that are uplifting and joyous.  My two recent favourites that meet this criteria are the ones by the University of Quebec students who filmed an amazing one take video to a Black Eyed Peas’ song and the wedding intro. dance by JK.  The wedding dance video is now over 25 million hits and counting!  Can the University of Quebec students’ video (at over 200, 000 and counting) beat it?  Here they are:


 
They are just so fun to watch. Here is Countdown’s list of the most popular viral videos. Which viral video do you like? Is it on this list?

The Influence of Social Networking, Part Deux…

Yesterday I posted about Social Networking sites and the influence they are having on society. Today in the news we find out that a Facebook poll asked the question “Shoud Obama be killed?” and over 700 people had answered it.

This post is not about politics.  According to Jose Antonio Vargas if you search the site for Sarah Palin you will find disagreeable pages as well.  According to him it is not Facebook itself that is the problem.  Rather it is the people who use Facebook that are the problem.  While I don’t disagree with him it does concern me what this means for our society when false and/or hurtful information can spread so virally.  If Facebook were around on November 22, 1963 perhaps there would have been an organized mob of people pointing guns at President Kennedy rather than just Lee Harvey Oswald’s (he was the lone shooter, right?)?

I agree with what Kathleen Hall Jamieson says about society when she says in Vargas’ article that, “Society has always had extremists.  They just haven’t had a public venue we could all see before…”.  Sites such as Facebook do allow for unsavory views to be shared but ultimately it is the user’s belief and values that must resist against participating in hurtful things like this online poll.  It is for this reason that I think Facebook should not be the target of our scorn. 

So, what is the best way to fight extremist views while still maintaining freedom of communication?  Vargas talks about how social networking is relatively new and as a resulthere is no agreement on an acceptable code of conduct.  Ultimately the answer will lie in education.  All users, especially young people will need to be educated on how to identify extremist, hurtful views and what steps they should take to reject them.

This situation raises many questions.  Should social networking sites be shut down to protect the public?  Would this action be a limit on free speech and run counter to our society’s values of freedom and democracty?  Shoud there be stricter moderation of social networking sites?  Should there be an online code of conduct?  If so, how would it be enforced?  Who would be in charge?  How do we stop dangerous extremism from spreading while still protecting freedom of speech?  Can the Internet be controlled?  Should it be?

These are all interesting questions that deserve our contemplation.  What do you think?

The Influence of Social Networking…

I find Social Networking sites, especially ones like Facebook, to be fascinating from a sociological perspective. Admittedly I spend/waste? time on them so I am not an impartial observer, but I often think about how these things are changing our societal values, interactions etc. A 16 year old relative of mine doesn`t even think twice when he posts about illegal activities he does with his friends, nor does he worry about posting pictures that show them in incriminating situations. He does this despite being “friends” with about 15 of our relatives, including his uncle aunt and his great uncles and aunts. If it was only him I would say he is not the smartest guy in the world, but I see a lot of my younger “friends” on Facebook, and by extension their “friends”, do the same thing. I contend what is happening is a shift in social values in regards to privacy and information not simply a bunch of stupid teenagers being ignorant of their online profiles.

More and more articles are coming out about Social Networking and how it is affecting culture. Reading them tends to reinforce my opinion that changes are afoot. But, if you really stop and think about them you must question this logic. Are real changes in culture happening, or are people doing what they have always done but in different mediums?

What are your thoughts about these articles:

Social Networking has tripled
What is privacy today?
Social Networking and the effect on television
Facebook bullies sued by mother

Web 2.0

For my UBC Mater’s Degree course on the Foundations of Educational Technology our first task is to choose a modern computing term and create a detailed definition of it.  I chose Web 2.0 (my definition to follow).  Until I post my defintion here are some great sites that collect a number of Web 2.0 tools that you can use for business or pleasure:

  1. Cool Tools for School
  2. Go2Web20

Enjoy!